english russian
19.05.2012 | Суббота | 01:11 GMT+2
Все темы  
 
пн вт ср чт пт сб вс
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
 
 Андриевский Виталий
 Бурнос Тарас
 Власов Алексей
 Выдрин Дмитрий
 Голосов Григорий
 Ивженко Татьяна
 Искандарян Александр
 Карасев Вадим
 Кулик Виталий
 Марат Эрика
 Маркедонов Сергей
 Месамед Владимир
 Петросян Давид
 Погребинский Михаил
 Портников Виталий
 Расов Сергей
 Родин Иван
 Самарина Александра
 Тарасов Станислав
 Ханин Владимир (Зеэв)
 Цинкер Александр
Все авторы  
E-mail:
info@elections-ices.org
Дирекция ICES: Klumpkestraat 15
6241 JC Bunde
Netherlands
Тел.: +31-64-627-6282

Филиал в Израиле:
P.O.B. 20596
Tel-Aviv 61202, Israel
Tel.: +972-5243-31525
Fax: +972-3505-5335

Представительство в США:
10015 Lake Creek Pkwy,
Unit 1221, Austin, TX,
78729 USA
Теl.: +1-512-709-3992

Представительство в Германии:
P.O. Box 190113,
97040, Wuerzburg Germany
Теl.: +49-931-886-841

Арабо-израильский конфликт  |  Выборы в Беларуси 2012  |  Выборы в Верховную Раду  |  Выборы в Грузии 2012  |  Выборы президента США  |  Израиль - б.СССР  |  Иранская проблема  |  Молдавский выбор  |  Новая Россия  |  Политкухня Израиля  |  Правда Беларуси  |  Сирийский узел  |  США - Россия  |  США в Евразии  |  Украина Today  |  Центральная Азия  |  Южный Кавказ
 Сегодня на сайте:   »
04 августа 2009 | Alexander Tsinker
Moldovan zugzwang after the parliamentary election

As it had been predicted by public opinion polls, four oppositional parties got the majority in the Parliament after the early election in Moldova, which had been held on July 29. These parties will be able to form a governing coalition, elect the Parliament’s Speaker and start legislative activities.

Nevertheless, there are not enough votes of anti-communist parties, which got the seats in the Parliament, to elect the new Moldovan President (this was the reason why the early election was held). And this is the President who proposes the Prime Minister candidate and confirms the new government.

The situation, which took place in Moldova in May 2009 repeats itself, but at that time it was the Communists who needed one more vote to elect the President. The opposition boycotted the voting on the Communist candidate, saying that they would seek the Parliament dissolution (according to the law, if the President is not elected after two attempts, the Parliament must be dissolved).

If we don’t take into account the hardly probable scenario, when one of the sides admits its defeat and drops out of the fight, and if we overlook all the political nuances, now there are only two ways out of the current situation. Let’s call them “Ukrainian” and “Israeli” ones for convenience.

“Ukrainian” scenario

Two opposing sides fight to the bitter end, thus blocking the activity of all the government bodies. The attempts to elect the new head of state fail again. The attempts to make amendments in the Moldovan Constitution would be initiated to find a way out of the current zugzwang, or the new early elections will be called. The society polarization would be still deeper and the political clashes would be still more radical.

This situation looks like the political process that has been developing in Ukraine since 2004. Then in Ukraine and now in Moldova both the sides enjoy approximately equal support of the population and of the Parliament but can’t (or probably don’t want to) stand beyond the party’s interests and find the compromising solution.

“Israeli” scenario

Nowadays Moldova, which is the poorest country in Europe, torn by internal contradictions and problems of self-proclaimed Transnistria and autonomous region of Gagauz, is in a critical situation. There is not only the question, which way they should choose or what countries Moldova should orient strategically (here a whole set of propositions exists). The situation is much more complicated. Under the circumstances and correlation of political forces there is the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Moldova are in danger.

For 60 years of the history of Israel more than once uncompromising rivals, two the largest Israeli parties, formed a grand coalition in the Parliament in order to unite the people, to work out social compromise and to make vital, strategic decisions.

It’s understandable that this is the interim measure, but it makes it possible to end the deadlock and let the both sides make concessions to each other.

There are few scenarios for the Moldovan establishment: either to continue the confrontation or to try to find the way out of the situation. Which way the elected MPs will choose depends on their wisdom.

источник: "Eurasian Home"
 назад    наверх
принт версия
18.05 | Владимир Сонюк
Программа максимум для власти Украины
18.05 | Павел Казарин
Как живут в Узбекистане
17.05 | Александр Цинкер
Вероятность наличия сильной оппозиции в новом парламенте Армении сводится к минимуму
17.05 | Сергей Белашко
Конфликтные линии парламентских выборов в Украине - 2012
16.05 | Ариф Юнусов
В Азербайджане мало кто верит в содействие Запада в вопросе урегулирования НКК
13.05 | Роман Ларионов
Россия: Долгожданное прибавление
12.05 | Юрий Бочаров
Израиль: неожиданное создание новой коалиции
Все публикации
© 2005-2010 Экспертный Центр ICES | All rights reserved
При полном или частичном использовании материалов, ссылка на e-ices.org обязательна.
Мнения авторов могут не совпадать с позицией редакции.
Developed by Robertson
generation: 0,667